The Star Tribune conducted a poll of Minnesotans about same-sex marriage. According to the poll, published in May 1, 2009 Metro section, a “slight” shift is taking place in regards to same-sex marriage. Many states, most recently Iowa, have rewritten law to allow same-sex marriage. The topic of same-sex marriage is a lightning rod and a polarizing conversation. Although homosexuals are celebrate every state that passes law allowing same-sex marriage; homosexuals need to be leery of “progress”.
President Obama’s Stimulus Bill earmarked money to assist in making all medical records electronic. Another goal of President Obama is universal health care. On the surface these two items appear to be mutually exclusive and harmless. As medical records become electronic it will make it easier create a national medical record system. The guise of creating a national data bank for medical records will be for the ease of sharing client files.
Don’t be fooled. The push for electronic files, national databank, and universal healthcare are all signs of increase intrusion into our personnel lives. One may be asking themselves how this adheres itself to same-sex marriage.
Back in 1993 the journal Science Dean Hamer, PhD, reported the discovery of a “gay gene”. In an article posted on WebMD Health News(Jan. 28, 2005), Brian Mustanski, PhD at University of Illinois, stated, “It builds on previous studies that have consistently found evidence of genetic influence on sexual orientation, but our study is the first to look at exactly where those genes are located.” Dr. Mustaski is referencing a study done to compare chromosome of both parents to help identify DNA that supports the existence of the “gay gene”.
Now if a “gay gene” does exist and the government establishes the national databank of medical files and universal healthcare, how soon will a test be created to discover if the unborn fetus contains the gene? I typically am not a conspiracy theorist but I am a big picture thinker. Looking at all the small pieces that are being put in place, homosexuals need to be aware of the consequences of what they seek.
Now, I am not saying that if you decide to live your life with a member of the same-sex that it is right or wrong. I am merely putting all homosexuals on notice. As I have stated in a previous blog post, the government should not be in the business of marriage. As more states allow same-sex marriage only furthers the government’s ability to track, record, and identify homosexuals.
Combine the same-sex marriage license data, national medical database, universal healthcare, and the identification of a “gay gene” and we have a recipe for genetic manipulation to eradicate the United States of homosexuals. It is time for homosexuals to stand behind the flag of smaller government and demand a shift from marriage licenses to certification of civil unions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What the...???
ReplyDeleteThis is probably the weakest argument ever for the GLBT nation to join up with the republicans.
First of all, there is no evidence that homosexuality is purely genetic. Read this page for more details:
http://www.narth.com/docs/istheregene.html
Secondly, after your last post about shutting down the border to manage the N1H1 virus, I would think you'd want there to be a medical data bank. I mean, if you're willing to put hundreds of billions of dollars of trade at risk over this flu, why would you want to squash this effort to bring medical records into the 21st century?
Thirdly, I'm not convinced that you think government should stay out of the (same-sex) marriage issue. This post reads like you have issues with the GLBT community. Don't get me wrong, I don't think you necessarily hate them, I just don't think you respect or understand them as much as you think you do.
This theory of yours is good, old fashioned fear-mongering.
Pat. My blog post is not to enlist GLBT Nation with Republicans. Rather it is to warn the GLBT Nation of elements being put in place to identify, track, and eventually eradicate their lifestyle. I read your link and I noticed that the author only references the 1993 study and does not address the findings from Dr. Mustanski’s findings from 2005. Here is the link for the WebMD Health News I referenced originally.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20050128/is-there-gay-gene
Research is being done to prove the “Gay Gene” exists or at least there is a strong correlation to a specific gene and the lifestyle followed. I am not saying I am completely on board with this notion; I am putting out there the small pieces that are being put in place for a grand plan.
I completely agree that converting medical records from paper, isolated, files to electronic files is a great step to undertake. In an age where we can make technology work for us and share data more easily is a move that makes sense. What you missed about my call for closing the border was not to put billions of dollars of trade at risk, rather to close the border to general transportation. The teleprompter can still close the borders and allow commerce to flow.
Although I do not agree with the lifestyle of the GLBT Nation, I acknowledge of their right as a United States citizen to live their life the way they choose. I also acknowledge that marriage is an institution rooted in Judea-Christian values that is not something any Government should define. Earlier in the year I wrote to a group within the GLBT Nation to open the approach of certification of civil unions.
If we are to stay true to the concept of the separation of church and state, then the conversation of marriage is not something that never should be applied to any government constitution or law of the land. Our Founding Fathers did not intend for Government to be the answer to all. This includes the issue of Marriage.
From a legal stance in regards to wills, power of attorneys or healthcare availability the established of a Civil Union certification is the path to go. Simply put, through the establishment of a Civil Union certificate it will just acknowledge the commitment between two people. I am not fear-mongering or trying to recruit for the Republican Party.
I am not a follower of the Republican or Democrat Party. I believe that Government is to big already and the current administration is only making it bigger. In order to feed larger government one will realize less freedoms and more tax obligation.