ABC draws possible Tea Party connection with alleged Aurora shooter
Yellow Journalism is alive and well at ABC. What prompted ABC to search for Jim Holmes and Tea Party? Brian Ross is suppose to be the Chief investigator at ABC. Why on Earth does the main stream media feel the need to speculate? I am all for doing the heavy lifting in order to get a scoop and trying to determine if the shooter has ties to a larger group of people. But don't report on it if all it is a speculation! Brian Ross and everyone on set at the time should be fired and never allowed again to report the news.
Friday, July 20, 2012
Sunday, July 8, 2012
Student Loans or Tuition?
On Friday President Obama signed into law HR 4348 (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr4348enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr4348enr.pdf) to continue federal funding of highways and subsidizing of student loans for college students. President Obama said, "For months, I've been calling on Congress to take half the money we're no longer spending on war and use it to do some nation-building here at home. There's work to be done building roads and bridges and wireless networks. And there are hundreds of thoughts of construction workers ready to do it." Yet President Obama won't allow the Keystone Pipeline but I digress. President Obama continued to say, "The same thing is true for our students. The bill I'm about to sign is vital for millions of students and their families. But it's not enough to just keep their student loan rates from doubling." (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78193.html)
The President is correct when stating that keeping "student loan rates from doubling" is not enough. The trouble with higher education is the cost/benefit relationship. Granted students can be their own worse enemy by going into a major that has no future or little chance of assisting in repaying loans taken out. The average cost for a 4-year public institution is $12,804 while private institution is $32,184 which have both increased by 37 percent and 25 percent respectively since 1999.(http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=76).
During the debate on subsidizing student loan rates reports of students leaving school with $100,000 in debt and not being able to find jobs to help repay them. When did it become a right to be given a job after one graduates from college? Perhaps these students that come out with over $100,000 in debt should ensure the degree or career path they seek exists. Former Secretary of Education William Bennett views the student loan subsidy as the next bubble the United States will face. While Mr. Bennett does believe that rates should remain low for part of society that doesn't include the middle or upper class. Mr. Bennett poses this question, "If we keep interest rates low, will colleges reciprocate and by keeping tuition low?" (http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/higher-education-bubble-bennett-says-u-govt-stop-124251984.html).
I don't think so Mr Bennett. Unfortunately, the higher education system offers classes and degrees that are obsolete or little demand for them. Then again, as I stated above, students going to school need to use their brains when choosing their degree or career path. If one is going to spend $60-$100K on a higher education then one best learn a skill set that will garner a job that makes $60-$100K a year. Trouble is that entry level positions don't pay that. Right now we have $1T in student loan debt outstanding. The dirty little secret is that if one hangs onto their subsidized student loan it will be forgiven after 20 years. Then who is left on the hook?
The President is correct when stating that keeping "student loan rates from doubling" is not enough. The trouble with higher education is the cost/benefit relationship. Granted students can be their own worse enemy by going into a major that has no future or little chance of assisting in repaying loans taken out. The average cost for a 4-year public institution is $12,804 while private institution is $32,184 which have both increased by 37 percent and 25 percent respectively since 1999.(http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=76).
During the debate on subsidizing student loan rates reports of students leaving school with $100,000 in debt and not being able to find jobs to help repay them. When did it become a right to be given a job after one graduates from college? Perhaps these students that come out with over $100,000 in debt should ensure the degree or career path they seek exists. Former Secretary of Education William Bennett views the student loan subsidy as the next bubble the United States will face. While Mr. Bennett does believe that rates should remain low for part of society that doesn't include the middle or upper class. Mr. Bennett poses this question, "If we keep interest rates low, will colleges reciprocate and by keeping tuition low?" (http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/higher-education-bubble-bennett-says-u-govt-stop-124251984.html).
I don't think so Mr Bennett. Unfortunately, the higher education system offers classes and degrees that are obsolete or little demand for them. Then again, as I stated above, students going to school need to use their brains when choosing their degree or career path. If one is going to spend $60-$100K on a higher education then one best learn a skill set that will garner a job that makes $60-$100K a year. Trouble is that entry level positions don't pay that. Right now we have $1T in student loan debt outstanding. The dirty little secret is that if one hangs onto their subsidized student loan it will be forgiven after 20 years. Then who is left on the hook?
Saturday, July 7, 2012
Hamburg City Council Agenda - July 10, 2012
1.
Call City Council Meeting to Order
·
Pledge of Allegiance
2.
Public Comment (Individuals may address the City Council about any non-agenda item(s) of
concern. Speakers must state their name, address, and limit their remarks to
three minutes. The City Council may not take official action on these items and
may refer the matter to staff for a future report or direct that the matter be
scheduled for a future meeting agenda.)
3.
Agenda Review (Added Items) and Adoption
4.
Consent Agenda
(NOTICE TO PUBLIC: All those items listed as part of the
Consent Agenda will be approved by a single motion, unless a request to discuss
one of those items is made prior to that time. Anyone present at the meeting
may request an item to be removed from the consent agenda. Please inform the
Council when they approve the agenda for this meeting.)
·
Approve Minutes for June 12, 2012
·
MNSPECT Minute for July 2012
·
May Cash Flow Statement
·
MN DNR Statewide Shoreland & Floodplain Management
·
Carver County 2 Year Assessment Service Agreement
Increase (5%)
·
Carver County
Water Resource Management
Ordinance Amendments
·
Animal Impound Contract with Countryside Veterinary
Clinic
·
Adopt Carver
County Hazard Mitigation
Plan
o
Adopt Resolution Number 2012-05
·
Water Wells
Usage/Water Consumption Reports for June 2012
·
Delinquent Utility Bills Report
·
Employee Project Lists
5.
Fire Department Report – Chief Brad Droege
·
DNR Grant
Application
·
Memorandum
of Understanding (Minitor V Pagers)
·
Memorial
for Public Servants (Protective Services) Update
·
Decorative
Fountain for Park Pond
6.
Justin Black – City Engineer (S.E.H.)
·
Comprehensive
Street Inventory Report (Street Management Plan)
o Street Repairs for 2012
o Overlay of County
Road 50
§
Joint
Powers Agreement w/ Carver
County
·
Sanitary & Storm Water Improvement
Project
o
Final Check/Punch List Items
o
Private Property Service Lines (Illegal
Connections/Replacement)
7.
Old City
Business (Memo)
·
City Clean
Up Day (Fall 2012)
·
2010 Census
Count/Met Council Population Estimates (April 1, 2011)
·
Park Food Stand (Re-Siding)
·
Sidewalk Replacement (Henrietta Ave )
·
Community Center Closet Door (Replace)
·
Sign for City Hall/Township
·
National Night Out (August 7th)
– Committee Meeting June 26th
o
Next Meeting Scheduled for July 17,
2012 @ 7:00 PM
·
Use of SHIP Monies (Handicap Access to
Parks)
·
Revised NIMS
Training Program (Requirements)
8.
Public Works & Utilities Department Report
·
Liftstation
Repairs
o Dialer
o Pumps
·
Community
Center (Paint)
9.
City Clerk/Treasurer Report
·
Insurance Claims from June 18th & 19th
Storms
o
Sewer Back-ups
o
HFD Sign & Baseball Park Fence
·
August 14th City Council Meeting
o
Move to August 16th
10.
Approve Payment of Added June 2012 Claims
Approve
Payment of July 2012 Claims
11.
City Council Reports
·
Councilmember Mueller Report (Sewer & Water)
o
SAFL Baffle Estimate
·
Councilmember Lund Report (Streets)
·
Councilmember Trebesch Report (Buildings)
·
Councilmember Barnes Report (Parks)
·
Mayor Malz Report
11.
Adjourn City Council Meeting
COMMUNITY HALL & PARK ACTIVITIES
JULY 13
– Wm. Mueller & Sons (Park)
16
– Hamburg
Lions Club (Park)
21
– Parkside Tavern Yard Olympics (Park)
23-24 – Fahey Inc Auction
28
– Wedding Reception (Neubarth)
AUGUST 5 – Park Rental (Wroge)
7 – National Night Out
6-10 – Community Education
Park Program
15
– Boy Scouts (Park)
18
– Wedding Reception (Panning/Schwalbe)
18
– Emanuel Lutheran Ribfest
20
– Hamburg
Lions Club (Park)
26
– Park Rental (Schmidt)
COMMUNITY CENTER (FIRE HALL) ACTIVITIES
JULY 2 – Hamburg
Lions Club
2 – HFD Training
4 – Independence Day – City Offices Closed
10 – Hamburg City Council Meeting – 7:00 PM
10 – Young America
Township Board Meeting
16 – Hamburg Lions Club
17 – National
Night Out Committee Mtg. – 7:00 PM
21 – Community
Center Rental (Eggers)
30 – Hamburg Fire Department
(HFDRA)
31 – National
Night Out Committee Mtg. – 7:00 PM
AUGUST 6 – Hamburg
Lions Club
6 – HFD Training
14 – State Primary Election 7:00 AM to
8:00 PM
16 – Hamburg City
Council Meeting – 7:00 PM (?)
27 - Hamburg
Fire Department (HFDRA)
28 – 2013 Budget
Workshop (?)
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Happy 4th of July!!!
I know I am a day early but I won't be near a computer on the 4th of July. Take time tomorrow to reflect on what it means to be an American. What is means to have the American Spirit. What is means to be free. Most of all be safe on the 4th of July and enjoy the day of celebrating the birth of a Nation that has offered so much opportunity to people.
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Campaign Financing - Foreign Dollars in play
Progressives were up in arms after the United States Supreme Court ruled that Corporations have the right to run ads for or against candidates as well as contribute money to Super PAC's. The Citizen's United case paved the way, and the recent ruling by the SCOTUS this past week, for a large influx of money and energy to be poured into every campaign in the United States. A prime example is the recent recall attempt of Governor Scott Walker in Wisconsin.
The recall election saw pro-Scott Walker camps outspending anti-Scott Walker camps nearly 8 to 1. Progressive pundits claimed that the large difference in money spent was the main contributor to Governor Walker remaining in office. Progressives are upset because their Union coffers no longer give them an advantage with the decision of Citizen's United. One of the fears discussed after Citizen's United was the influx of foreign cash into campaigns.
To date the Democrat National Party has raised over $335M while the Republican National Party has raised over $320M. PAC's have raised, collectively, just as much as both parties. Unfortunately I couldn't find a breakout of the PAC's based on who they backed on the Federal Election Commission website (www.fec.gov). All this being said, George Clooney will be assissting President Obama in Geneva, Switzerland to raise "euro-cash" for re-election. http://www.fec.gov/disclosure/partySummary.do?cf=phome
First, Progressives rail against the lost monopoly of Union warchest with the upholding of Citizen's United. Now, Progressives are bringing in foreign dollars and influences which they said Conservatives would do with the Citizen's United decision. When will the Federal Election Commission rule that no money but a small stipend from the Federal Government may be spent on elections? Even though I contend that every American has the God given right to voice their opinion in favor or against a candidate, I do draw the line at foreign influences. I do acknowledge that both sides are guilty too.
The recall election saw pro-Scott Walker camps outspending anti-Scott Walker camps nearly 8 to 1. Progressive pundits claimed that the large difference in money spent was the main contributor to Governor Walker remaining in office. Progressives are upset because their Union coffers no longer give them an advantage with the decision of Citizen's United. One of the fears discussed after Citizen's United was the influx of foreign cash into campaigns.
To date the Democrat National Party has raised over $335M while the Republican National Party has raised over $320M. PAC's have raised, collectively, just as much as both parties. Unfortunately I couldn't find a breakout of the PAC's based on who they backed on the Federal Election Commission website (www.fec.gov). All this being said, George Clooney will be assissting President Obama in Geneva, Switzerland to raise "euro-cash" for re-election. http://www.fec.gov/disclosure/partySummary.do?cf=phome
First, Progressives rail against the lost monopoly of Union warchest with the upholding of Citizen's United. Now, Progressives are bringing in foreign dollars and influences which they said Conservatives would do with the Citizen's United decision. When will the Federal Election Commission rule that no money but a small stipend from the Federal Government may be spent on elections? Even though I contend that every American has the God given right to voice their opinion in favor or against a candidate, I do draw the line at foreign influences. I do acknowledge that both sides are guilty too.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Obamacare is a tax!!
SCOTUS ruled on ObamaCare today.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-393c3a2.pdf
Chief Justice Roberts joined the four other left leaning justices to agree that Congress has the ability to mandate every American must purchase health care or risk being "taxed". All Justices, except for Ginsberg, agreed that the mandate fails and is unconstitutional based on the limited powers the Commerce Clause places on Congress.
A TAX! Back in 2009 in an interview with George Stephanopoulos, President Obama asserted that Stephanopoulos was making up words by calling the health care mandate a tax.
http://youtu.be/bg-ofjXrXio
During the three day questioning earlier this year, it was Justice Kagan had to help the Solicitor General through the tough questioning to get out the fact that the mandate is a tax.
What is next? What new tax will Congress place upon us to mandate us do something? Here is an example. Democrats fought hard to require health insurance companies to be required to provide free birth control to all women even if it violated ones religious beliefs or tenets. The Affordable Care Act also established a non-elected governance board that will make decisions on what will be covered and not. Environmentalists have argued that the worlds food supply is not enough to sustain the current population. What prevents Congress now from passing a "tax" for each additional child one has past the first born? Or What prevents Congress from passing a "tax" that requires all adults to be sterilized after the first or second child?
The Chief Justice's decision to consider this a tax has opened Pandora's Box of the use of a tax to mandate Americans to do or not to do something.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-393c3a2.pdf
Chief Justice Roberts joined the four other left leaning justices to agree that Congress has the ability to mandate every American must purchase health care or risk being "taxed". All Justices, except for Ginsberg, agreed that the mandate fails and is unconstitutional based on the limited powers the Commerce Clause places on Congress.
A TAX! Back in 2009 in an interview with George Stephanopoulos, President Obama asserted that Stephanopoulos was making up words by calling the health care mandate a tax.
http://youtu.be/bg-ofjXrXio
During the three day questioning earlier this year, it was Justice Kagan had to help the Solicitor General through the tough questioning to get out the fact that the mandate is a tax.
What is next? What new tax will Congress place upon us to mandate us do something? Here is an example. Democrats fought hard to require health insurance companies to be required to provide free birth control to all women even if it violated ones religious beliefs or tenets. The Affordable Care Act also established a non-elected governance board that will make decisions on what will be covered and not. Environmentalists have argued that the worlds food supply is not enough to sustain the current population. What prevents Congress now from passing a "tax" for each additional child one has past the first born? Or What prevents Congress from passing a "tax" that requires all adults to be sterilized after the first or second child?
The Chief Justice's decision to consider this a tax has opened Pandora's Box of the use of a tax to mandate Americans to do or not to do something.
Friday, June 22, 2012
The Most Transparent President Ever!
While on the campaign trail, Sen. Obama blasted past administrations for allowing special interest groups access to the White House and the lack of transparency too. Interesting that as the Fast and Furious debacle plays out that President Obama would exercise Executive Privilege over information Congress is asking Attorney General Holder to provide.
Then the Wall Street Journal is reporting that David Axelrod's advertising group, which he supposedly cut ties with, was intragal in promoting ObamaCare. American's can only hope that the US Supreme Court strikes down ObamaCare but that still doesn't take away the recent efforts of the White House to cover-up and conceal. Perhaps we are witnessing another Watergate!
Then the Wall Street Journal is reporting that David Axelrod's advertising group, which he supposedly cut ties with, was intragal in promoting ObamaCare. American's can only hope that the US Supreme Court strikes down ObamaCare but that still doesn't take away the recent efforts of the White House to cover-up and conceal. Perhaps we are witnessing another Watergate!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)